|
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| README.md | ||
| main.py | ||
README.md
Sequential vs Parallel Processing
Demonstrates how AsyncParallelBatchNode accelerates processing by 3x over AsyncBatchNode.
Features
- Processes identical tasks with two approaches
- Compares sequential vs parallel execution time
- Shows 3x speed improvement with parallel processing
Run It
pip install pocketflow
python main.py
Output
=== Running Sequential (AsyncBatchNode) ===
[Sequential] Summarizing file1.txt...
[Sequential] Summarizing file2.txt...
[Sequential] Summarizing file3.txt...
=== Running Parallel (AsyncParallelBatchNode) ===
[Parallel] Summarizing file1.txt...
[Parallel] Summarizing file2.txt...
[Parallel] Summarizing file3.txt...
Sequential took: 3.00 seconds
Parallel took: 1.00 seconds
Key Points
-
Sequential: Total time = sum of all item times
- Good for: Rate-limited APIs, maintaining order
-
Parallel: Total time ≈ longest single item time
- Good for: I/O-bound tasks, independent operations